Question
A government officer is part of a committee evaluating
tenders for a large project. His brother-in-law is the Director of one of the bidding companies but holds no shares. The officer informs his superior but proposes to continue on the committee, promising to be objective. What is the most appropriate course of action?Solution
The mere appearance of a conflict of interest can undermine public trust. Transparency does not eliminate the conflict. The only way to ensure absolute integrity and fairness is for the officer to recuse himself completely from the process.
Beside foggy conditions, (1) / the minimum temperature sharply fall in (2)/ the region as the mercury hovered (3)/ among four degrees below normal to (4...
Directions: In each of the questions, a sentence has been divided into four parts, one of which may contain an error. Identify that fragment and mark i...
Wealthier countries in Europe/ need to do far more when /it comes to stumping up/ proper resources for overseas conservation.
Finance Ministry in a notification said customs duty in open-cell (15.6-inch and above), (A) / for use in the manufacture of (B) / Liquid Crystal Displa...
Somehow, my sister (A)/avoids to cook large dinners and (B)/I am trying to learn from her (C).
The committee of experts, along with their assistants, were /reviewing the final report and will submit/ it to the board next week after they/ has finis...
In the question given below, a sentence is given, divided into parts. One of the parts may contain an error. Identify the part that contains the err...Read the given sentence to find out whether there are any grammatical/contextual errors in them. The errors, if any, will be in two of the phrases of th...
 I immediately quitted (1)/ the job in which (2)/ neither the skill nor (3)/ knowledge was required. (4)/ No error (5)Â
Read each sentence to find out whether there is any error in it. The error, if any, will be in one part of the sentence. The letter of that part is the ...
