Question
As per Section 165 (6) of the Companies Act 2013, if a
person accepts an appointment as a director in contravention of sub-section (1), he shall be punishable with fine of ____ thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such violation continues subject to a maximum of ……….. lakh rupees.Solution
This is important section because government has suggested a changes in this section in Companies Amendment Act 2020. The suggested changes are as follows: Section 165 (6): If a person accepts an appointment as a director in violation of this section, he shall be liable to a penalty of two thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such violation continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees.
In the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. Read the ...
Which of the following expressions will be true if the expression P > Q = R < S = T ≤ U = V is definitely true?
Statements: M % C & G @ T $ D; W % M # P
Conclusions :Â Â Â Â Â I. D % CÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. M % GÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â I...
Which of the following symbols should replace the question marks (?) in the given expression in order to make the expression ‘N ≤ Q’ definitely t...
Statements: U = G ≥ T, M < J < H = T, M = A > L
Conclusions:
I. U > M
II. G ≥ A
III. L < T
Statements: I < G = Z = X ≤ A ≤ R < N > D = V
Conclusions:
I. I > D
II. R ≥ G
III. X < V
Statements: S = T, U < L, V ≥ S, T ≤ U
Conclusion:
I. T ≤ V
II. L > T
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given three conclusions is /are definitely true and t...
Statements: P = J = W; W ≥ Y < Q; Q < Z = L
Conclusions:
I. W ≥ Z
II. W < Z
In the given question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusions I and II given below the statements is/are definitely tr...
