📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • âś–

      Question

      Consider the following statements regarding Puttaswamy
      v. Union of India and IT Act implications: Statement 1: The judgment established that right to privacy is a fundamental right. Statement 2: Privacy violations through digital surveillance are covered under IT Act Sections 66E and 69. Statement 3: The judgment restricts government's interception authority under Section 69. Statement 4: Section 69 interception remains unrestricted after Puttaswamy judgment. Which statements are correct?

      A Statements 1, 2, and 3 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B Statements 1 and 2 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C Statements 2 and 4 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Statements 1 and 4 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E All statements are correct Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      Puttaswamy recognized privacy as fundamental—Statement 1 is correct. Digital privacy violations are covered—Statement 2 is correct. The judgment required restrictions on government interception—Statement 3 is correct. Statement 4 is incorrect—restrictions apply. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct.

      Practice Next
      More Other Laws and Acts Questions

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question