Question
Consider the following statements regarding Puttaswamy
v. Union of India and IT Act implications: Statement 1: The judgment established that right to privacy is a fundamental right. Statement 2: Privacy violations through digital surveillance are covered under IT Act Sections 66E and 69. Statement 3: The judgment restricts government's interception authority under Section 69. Statement 4: Section 69 interception remains unrestricted after Puttaswamy judgment. Which statements are correct?Solution
Puttaswamy recognized privacy as fundamental—Statement 1 is correct. Digital privacy violations are covered—Statement 2 is correct. The judgment required restrictions on government interception—Statement 3 is correct. Statement 4 is incorrect—restrictions apply. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct.
Statement: T > B = PÂ `>=` Â C ; BÂ `>=` Â J > F; OÂ `<=` Â JÂ `<=` Â CÂ Â Â Â
Conclusions:  I.  J < T    II. T > F
...Statements: H > S ≥ F = B ≤ U≤ T; E ≤ B ≤ K
Conclusions:I. K > F II. K = F
Statements: A ≥ B = C; A < D < E; F > G > E
Conclusion:
I. D > C
II. C < E
In the following question the relationship between different elements is given in the statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. Read the...
Statements : T ≥ G; G > Z < Q ≥ P; P ≥ L < H = E
Conclusions :
I. Q > T
II. L ≤ Q
III. H > G
...In this question, the relation between various elements is shown in the statement. After the statement, two conclusions are given, select a suitable op...
Statement:
R ≤ P >K ≤ L; W ≤ X = K > O; Q > L
Conclusion:
I) W < L
II) L = W
In the question assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion(s) among given three conclusions is/are definitely follows and ...
Statements: O > M = Q > S; M ≥ K > A; Q ≤ O < E
Conclusions: Â Â Â Â Â I. O > SÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â II. K < OÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ...
Statement: X>W=Y>N≤P; W≥Z ;Z ≥P
I. X>Z
II. W≥P
Relevant for Exams:
