Question
A person was acquitted in the underlying scheduled
offence case but the ED wants to continue PMLA prosecution. Which statements are correct regarding the impact of acquittal on PMLA proceedings? Statement 1: Acquittal in the underlying scheduled offence case automatically results in dismissal of PMLA charges. Statement 2: The acquittal is not conclusive for PMLA proceedings; ED can continue if proceeds of crime can be proven independently. Statement 3: The standard of proof in PMLA proceedings is beyond reasonable doubt similar to criminal cases. Statement 4: A conviction in PMLA is possible even if the underlying scheduled offence case results in acquittal. Which statements are correct?Solution
Acquittal in underlying case does not automatically affect PMLA—Statement 2 is correct. Proceeds can be proven independently—Statement 2 is correct. PMLA uses beyond reasonable doubt standard—Statement 3 is correct. PMLA conviction is possible despite underlying acquittal—Statement 4 is correct. Statement 1 is incorrect. Statements 2, 3, and 4 are correct.
400 % of 20 + 65 % of 620 - 92 × 5 = ?
Simplify: 0.004 × 0.5
525 ÷ 21 x 28 – 853 + 264 = ?
- What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
?² = 28% of 35% of 4500 I. x² + 3x – 154 = 0
II. y² + 5y – 126 = 0
4(1/3) × 2(11/14) = 50% of ? + 86/11
3% of 3000 x ?% of 2000 = 3600
‘A’ and ‘B’ invested Rs. 5000 and Rs. 4200, respectively in a business, together. After 7 months, ‘A’ withdrew 25% of his initial investment...
(?) x 3 + 68 = √9025
Relevant for Exams:
