Question
Consider the following statements regarding Evidence
Act applicability in PMLA proceedings: Statement 1: Hearsay evidence is admissible in PMLA proceedings under Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act. Statement 2: Documentary evidence of transactions, though not signed by the accused, is admissible in PMLA proceedings to prove proceeds of crime. Statement 3: PMLA proceedings follow the ordinary criminal procedure and Evidence Act provisions strictly. Statement 4: Statements recorded under Section 24 of PMLA (reverse burden) may be used as evidence without full compliance with recording procedures. Which statements are correct?Solution
Statement 2 is correct—documentary evidence proving transaction chains is admissible. Statement 1 is incorrect—hearsay has limited admissibility. Statement 3 is incorrect—PMLA has its own procedural framework separate from CPC. Statement 4 is incorrect—recording procedures must be followed. Statement 2 alone is clearly correct.
 Safflower is which season crop?
What constitutional amendment led to the incorporation of Panchayat Raj institutions in India?
International Food Safety standards are developed by
What nutrient deficiency leads to the development of the "Red leaf disorder" in cotton plants?
The non-preference plant resistance to insects is also known as:
Heavy shedding of buds and bolls occurs in cotton due to:
Which one is not the component of programme planning?
Which type of farming involves cultivating a small area with maximum attention to detail?
How much average horsepower (hp) can a person develop for farm activities?
Anti nutritional factor found in soyabean are