📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!

  • google app store apple app store
  • âś–

      Question

      Consider the following statements regarding Evidence

      Act applicability in PMLA proceedings: Statement 1: Hearsay evidence is admissible in PMLA proceedings under Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act. Statement 2: Documentary evidence of transactions, though not signed by the accused, is admissible in PMLA proceedings to prove proceeds of crime. Statement 3: PMLA proceedings follow the ordinary criminal procedure and Evidence Act provisions strictly. Statement 4: Statements recorded under Section 24 of PMLA (reverse burden) may be used as evidence without full compliance with recording procedures. Which statements are correct?
      A Statements 1 and 3 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B Statements 2 and 3 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C Statements 1 and 4 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Statements 2 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E Statements 1, 2, and 4 only Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      Statement 2 is correct—documentary evidence proving transaction chains is admissible. Statement 1 is incorrect—hearsay has limited admissibility. Statement 3 is incorrect—PMLA has its own procedural framework separate from CPC. Statement 4 is incorrect—recording procedures must be followed. Statement 2 alone is clearly correct.

      Practice Next

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question