Question
Consider the following statements regarding Evidence
Act applicability in PMLA proceedings: Statement 1: Hearsay evidence is admissible in PMLA proceedings under Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act. Statement 2: Documentary evidence of transactions, though not signed by the accused, is admissible in PMLA proceedings to prove proceeds of crime. Statement 3: PMLA proceedings follow the ordinary criminal procedure and Evidence Act provisions strictly. Statement 4: Statements recorded under Section 24 of PMLA (reverse burden) may be used as evidence without full compliance with recording procedures. Which statements are correct?Solution
Statement 2 is correct—documentary evidence proving transaction chains is admissible. Statement 1 is incorrect—hearsay has limited admissibility. Statement 3 is incorrect—PMLA has its own procedural framework separate from CPC. Statement 4 is incorrect—recording procedures must be followed. Statement 2 alone is clearly correct.
Who sits opposite to M?
Who likes Fossil?
The number of persons sits between R and S is the same as between O and _____, when counted from the right of both S and O?
Which of the following statement is not true before the final arrangement?
Five articles, H, I, J, K and L, are kept one above the other (not necessarily in the same order). H is just above L and just below K. I is just above J...
Nine persons J, K, L, M, N, O, P, Q and R sit in a linear row face south. N sits fourth to the left of J, who sits at the end of the row. M sits second ...
How many persons are sitting between O and R?
Who is third to the left of S?
How many persons are facing away from the center?
Who among the following sits at one of the extreme ends?
Relevant for Exams:
