Question
In a commercial contract dispute, the defendant seeks to
prove an oral admission made by the plaintiff regarding the terms of the contract. However, the plaintiff now denies having made such statement. Under which section of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam must the defendant first establish his eligibility to give secondary evidence before the oral admission becomes admissible?Solution
Section 20 of BSA states: "Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question." This section specifically gates the admissibility of oral admissions regarding documentary contents, requiring satisfaction of secondary evidence conditions first.
Refer to the following letter sequence and answer the question given below:
 Left) P, T, S, A, Q, R, G, P, Q, N, D, F, L, H, R, F, A, N  (Ri...
The number of persons sits between R and S is the same as between O and _____, when counted from the right of both S and O?
Read the directions carefully and answer the following question.
Seven boxes P, Q, R, S, T, U and V are placed in a straight line facing North....
Four males A, B, C and D are sitting in a row facing towards the North (not necessarily in the same order) and four females P, Q, R and S are sitting in...
Six friends Chinu, Minu, Prem, Pari, Vansh and Vishu are sitting in a circle and facing the centre. Prem is to the immediate left of Pari. Only Vansh is...
What is the position of E from the left end?
Which of the following statements is/are true according to the given information?
How many persons are sitting between D and C when counted from the left of D?
D likes which of the colour?
How many persons are not facing south?