Question
In a commercial contract dispute, the defendant seeks to
prove an oral admission made by the plaintiff regarding the terms of the contract. However, the plaintiff now denies having made such statement. Under which section of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam must the defendant first establish his eligibility to give secondary evidence before the oral admission becomes admissible?Solution
Section 20 of BSA states: "Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question." This section specifically gates the admissibility of oral admissions regarding documentary contents, requiring satisfaction of secondary evidence conditions first.
Who is the Chairman of the State Legal Services Authority?Â
Under the Indian Evidence Act, evidence may be given of_________________
What is the validity period of a Shelf Prospectus as per the Companies Act?
Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, if a Hindu male dies intestate (without a will), which of the following will inherit first?
How many words are there in Preamble?
As per the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code what is required of every employer of an establishment under the given provision?
Which of the following is not true? Admissions:
Under Order 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, when a party makes admissions in the written statement or during examination, what is the effect?
Estoppel can be
Where is the Head Office of APEDA situated?