Question
An individual transferred property through a hawala
network to avoid tax and regulatory scrutiny. The transfer did not involve proceeds of crime from a scheduled offence, but involved tax evasion. Can PMLA be invoked? Statement 1: PMLA can be invoked because the transaction involved concealment. Statement 2: PMLA requires proceeds of crime from a scheduled offence; mere tax evasion is insufficient. Statement 3: The individual can be prosecuted under tax laws but not under PMLA. Statement 4: If the source of property cannot be explained, it becomes liable for attachment under PMLA. Which statements are correct?Solution
PMLA requires proceeds from scheduled offences under Section 2(1)(y)—Statement 2 is correct. Tax evasion alone (unless it falls within scheduled offences) is insufficient—Statement 3 is correct. Statements 1 and 4 are incorrect—PMLA is not applicable to mere tax evasion without nexus to scheduled offences. Statements 2 and 3 are correct.
Vaccination dose by some individuals benefits the individuals around them by reducing the pace with which the disease spreads. This is an example of whi...
For Ram, coarse rice is an inferior good. This means
'Hedging' in derivative markets is best described as:
Which of the following four-firm concentration ratios is most consistent with monopolistic competition?
What do you mean by ‘under conditions of a perfect competition in the product market’?
For goods x1 and x2 with prices P1 and P2, if dx1/dP2 is positive then,

Which of the following statements about the expansion path is true?
Which of the following statements is NOT CORRECT in the context of an Open Economy IS-LM Model under Floating Exchange Rate (with fixed price) and Perfe...
The Stolper-Samuelson theorem is a result in international trade theory. According to this theorem, an increase in the price of a good will: