Question
A cyber criminal used an intermediate server located outside India to access and modify data in an Indian government agency's computer system. The modification caused operational disruption. Under Section 66F, which statements are correct? Statement 1: The location of the attacker's server outside India exempts them from Section 66F. Statement 2: The breach of government system with intent to disrupt constitutes cyber terrorism under Section 66F. Statement 3: Section 66F applies only to acts committed within Indian territory. Statement 4: The operational disruption caused satisfies the intent requirement for Section 66F prosecution. Which statements are correct?
More Other Laws and Acts Questions
- Who prepares a panel of names of persons fit to be appointed as Public Prosecutors or Additional Public Prosecutors?
- Consider the following statements regarding Section 3 (Prohibitions on anti-competitive agreements) of the Competition Act, 2002: Statement 1: Section 3 p...
- The Supreme Court has recently delivered a judgment expounding the doctrine of "lis pendens in case of –
- What are the rules for determining the number of arbitrators in an arbitral tribunal?
- What is the Limitation period of recovery of immovable property?
- Forms and contents of Arbitral award are given under which section of Arbitration and Conciliation act, 1996?
- 1. Confidentiality extends to ?
- Under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, after the 2005 Amendment, a daughter of a coparcener shall:
- The concept of Fundamental Duties was borrowed from?
- Under Indian Penal Code. 1860, when the imprisonment awarded for solitary confinement shall exceed three months, the solitary confinement shall not exceed ...
Relevant for Exams:
Hey! Ask a query
Please enter email id
The email must be a valid email address.
Please enter Mobile Number
Please enter valid Mobile Number
Please enter your Doubt