Question
Consider the following statements regarding possession
of property disproportionate to known income under PCA, 1988: Statement 1: A public servant possessing property worth Rs. 1 crore when annual salary is Rs. 5 lakhs triggers presumption. Statement 2: The public servant must explain the source of excess property under reverse burden framework. Statement 3: If explanation is unsatisfactory, property is confiscated and public servant prosecuted. Statement 4: Legitimate sources like inheritance or gifts automatically exempt from disproportionate property scrutiny. Which statements are correct?Solution
Significant disproportion triggers reverse burden—Statement 1 is correct. Public servant must explain—Statement 2 is correct. Confession and property confiscation follow—Statement 3 is correct. Inheritance/gifts require documentation—Statement 4 is incorrect. Statements 1, 2, and 3 are correct.
The period of limitation for a suit for damages on account of malicious prosecution is:Â
Under the Contract Act the promise in a contract of indemnity, acting within the scope of his authority, is entitled to recover from the promisor_______...
No person shall be appointed by the State Government as the Public Prosecutor or Additional Public Prosecutor for the district unless his name appears i...
Break down theory of divorce is reflected in:
Asper the Insurance Act, 1938 when can the termination of the appointment of the Administrator be made by the Authority?
Preliminary decree can be passed in a suit:Â
Which of the following writ order can be issued in case of illegal detention?
Civil Court can be requested for assistance in taking evidence by?
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs constituted a committee to review the three codes of criminal law. Who was appointed as the head of this committee?
When did the Information Technology Act, 2000 came into force___________________