Question

Under Section 204 of the BNS, 2023, R, an ordinary citizen with no official credentials, fabricates a fake identification badge resembling that of a Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DR

  • I officer. R wears this badge and, without any actual authority, approaches a jeweler's shop, threatens the jeweler with supposed "anti-smuggling investigation," and demands to inspect the shop's records and cash holdings under the guise of conducting an official inquiry. The jeweler, intimidated, begins cooperating before a real DRI officer arrives and discovers the imposture. Which of the following correctly determines R's criminal liability under Section 204?
A R is liable under Section 204 because he falsely personated a public servant and, in such assumed character, attempted to perform an act under colour of that office
B R is not liable under Section 204 because no official action was actually completed; mere threatening or intimidation is covered under separate extortion provisions
C R is liable under Section 204 only if he successfully extracted information or money; attempted or incomplete personation does not constitute this offence
D R's liability under Section 204 is limited to wearing the badge; the threats constitute a separate offence under extortion sections, not Section 204 itself
E R is not liable under Section 204 because he did not hold any actual claim to the DRI officer position; Section 204 applies only to persons who previously held such positions
Practice Next

Hey! Ask a query