📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!


    Question

    Under Section 351(3) of the BNS, 2023, X sends an

    anonymous email to Y threatening to "publicize private intimate photographs" of Y's wife Z, unless Y withdraws a pending sexual harassment complaint against X in his workplace. X takes precautions to conceal his identity and email source. Which of the following correctly determines X's criminal liability?
    A X is liable only under Section 351(1) for criminal intimidation, as threats regarding reputation are covered under the basic provision, not the aggravated form Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B X is liable under Section 351(3) for threatening to cause injury to reputation combined with an imputation of unchastity, and under Section 351(4) for anonymous communication, with cumulative punishment applicable Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C X is liable under Section 351(3) only if he actually possesses such photographs; threatening to expose non-existent photographs cannot constitute this offense Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D X's liability under Section 351(3) is limited to a maximum of two years imprisonment because the threat concerns reputation, not physical harm Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E X is not liable under Section 351(3) because imputation of unchastity specifically covers only women's sexual conduct in traditional family contexts, not intimate photographs Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    Explanation: Section 351(3) of the BNS provides that "Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation by threatening to cause death or grievous hurt, or to cause the destruction of any property by fire, or to cause an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years, or to impute unchastity to a woman,shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both." Additionally, Section 351(4) states: "Whoever commits the offence of criminal intimidation by an anonymous communication, or having taken precaution to conceal the name or abode of the person from whom the threat comes, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to two years, in addition to the punishment provided for the offence under sub-section (1)." In X's case, the threat to publicize intimate photographs to impute unchastity to Z falls within Section 351(3), attracting up to 7 years imprisonment. The fact that the threat was made anonymously further invokes Section 351(4), which provides additional punishment of up to 2 years. These provisions are cumulative, not alternative. Thus, option (B) correctly identifies the dual liability and cumulative nature of punishment.

    Practice Next
    ask-question