ЁЯУв Too many exams? DonтАЩt know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert ЁЯСЙ call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • тЬЦ

      Question

      Under Section 11(2) of the SEBI Act, 1992, SEBI receives

      an anonymous complaint that a large investment advisory firm has been providing personalized investment advice to retail investors without obtaining the mandated written agreement required under SEBI regulations. SEBI's Director initiates an informal inquiry by telephoning the firm's compliance officer and requesting copies of select client files (approximately 50 files out of 5,000 total clients). The advisory firm provides these files voluntarily during the phone call conversation without insisting on a formal inspection notice. Subsequently, based on information in these files, SEBI suspects potential violations involving unregistered research analysts providing research reports. SEBI then issues a formal inspection notice seeking ALL client files and internal communications for the last five years. Which of the following correctly applies Section 11(2) to this scenario ?
      A SEBI's informal inquiry and voluntary file submission are valid; no formal inspection notice is required because the firm cooperated willingly during the phone conversation Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B SEBI's informal inquiry may be conducted, but a formal inspection notice issued under Section 11(2) must be based on application of mind by the designated SEBI authority regarding the scope, duration, and target of inspection; demanding five years of ALL client files without proportionate justification may exceed Section 11(2)'s reasonable scope Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C SEBI requires no authority or notice to conduct any inspection of intermediaries; Section 11(2) grants absolute inspection powers without limitations Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D SEBI's inspection is invalid because the initial inquiry was informal and voluntary; any inspection must follow formal notice requirements from the outset, making the entire proceeding defective Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E SEBI's Section 11(2) inspection powers apply only to stock exchanges and clearing corporations, not to investment advisory firms; the advisory firm cannot be inspected under this provision Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      Explanation: Section 11(2) of the SEBI Act provides that SEBI "may undertake following steps to achieve the objectives mentioned in sub-section (1): (vi) undertake inspection and investigation of the books, records, other documents of intermediaries and any person associated with the securities market." This power, while broad, is not unlimited. Judicial interpretation (Supreme Court decisions) has established that: (i) inspection must be based on reasonable cause/application of mind; (ii) the scope must be proportionate and relevant to the suspected violation; (iii) fishing expeditions or blanket inspections are impermissible; (iv) confidentiality of irrelevant or privileged information must be protected. In SEBI's case: The informal inquiry on alleged missing written agreements is reasonable. However, demanding five years of ALL client files (5,000 files) for a complaint involving potential unregistered research analyst communications may exceed proportionate scope. SEBI should specify: which files are relevant, what time period is necessary, and what documents are essential to the investigation. Courts have struck down inspection notices that demand excessive/unrelated documentation or extend beyond the reasonable scope of alleged violations. The voluntary submission during informal inquiry does not preclude formal inspection but does not waive SEBI's duty to issue a targeted, proportionate notice. Thus, option (B) correctly applies Section 11(2)'s scope with proportionality constraints.

      Practice Next
      More Other Laws and Acts Questions
      ask-question