Question
Which of the following is not a valid defense in an action for tort?
Solution
In tort law, mistake of fact is not a valid defense. Torts are generally based on civil wrongs, and liability arises even if the act was unintentional or based on a mistaken belief. • Volenti non fit injuria: "To a willing person, no injury is done" — valid defense when the plaintiff consents to the risk. • Inevitable accident: An accident that could not have been prevented despite reasonable care. • Act of God: Natural and unforeseeable event beyond human control, like earthquakes or floods. But mistake, even if made in good faith, is not an excuse for a wrongful act.
- What does “offence” generally mean under Section 2(24)?
- In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court discuss intermediary liability in the context of obscene material offered on an online platform?
- Under Section 16 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, "Undue Influence" is:
- Under the proviso to Section 8(1) (clarified through jurisprudence), what happens if a dispute partially falls within an arbitration agreement's scope?Â
- Section 6 of the DSPE Act is titled as:
- As per the definition of Prospectus under the Companies Act a prospectus means and includes___________
- Section dealing with “Related Party Transactions”:Â
- When was the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act enacted?
- According to the Industrial Relations Code what is the requirement for an industrial establishment regarding the formation of Grievance Redressal Committee...
- Which Part of the Constitution of India consists of Emergency provisions?