Question
The case of Waryam Singh v. Emperor (AIR 1926 Lah 554)
is on:Solution
IPC In Waryam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1926 Lah 554, a Division Bench, acting under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, held that an accused who killed a man with several blows from a stick was not liable under Section 302, Section 304 or Section 304A 'ibid' because he believed in good faith at the time of the attack that the object of his assault was not a living human being but a ghost or some object other than a living human being. The Division Bench made it clear that the ground for their opinion was that 'mens rea' or an intention to do wrong or to commit an offence did not exist in the case and that the object of culpable homicide could only be a living human being. (In this case appellant's wife along with her husband were taking a bath on grave of her child believing that they would get her son back. It was a dark night and villagers mistook husband to be a ghost and killed him).
What is the full form of TReDS?
Which of the following is a key determinant of operating leverage?
When the shares are issued for consideration other than cash which account will be debited
The approximate percentage change in a bond’s price for a 1% change in yield to maturity is given by:
What is the difference between bullion and numismatic coins?
Â
For an enterprise with investment in plant and machinery or equipment of Rs.9 crore and turnover of Rs.40 crore will be classified as _______ , as per M...
Payoff to a short position in a forward contract where the forward price is Rs.30 and spot price at maturity is Rs.55 will be _____
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) doubled the limit for collateral-free loans to micro and small enterprises (MSEs) from 5 lakhs to 10 lakhs following whi...
What is project financing?
An examination of the sources and uses of funds statement is part of: