Question
The case of Waryam Singh v. Emperor (AIR 1926 Lah 554)
is on:Solution
IPC In Waryam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1926 Lah 554, a Division Bench, acting under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, held that an accused who killed a man with several blows from a stick was not liable under Section 302, Section 304 or Section 304A 'ibid' because he believed in good faith at the time of the attack that the object of his assault was not a living human being but a ghost or some object other than a living human being. The Division Bench made it clear that the ground for their opinion was that 'mens rea' or an intention to do wrong or to commit an offence did not exist in the case and that the object of culpable homicide could only be a living human being. (In this case appellant's wife along with her husband were taking a bath on grave of her child believing that they would get her son back. It was a dark night and villagers mistook husband to be a ghost and killed him).
 The United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) has declared 2023 as the International Year of Millets (IYM). The leading country in millet production is
Sugarcane is a heavy feeder crop but higher doses of nitrogen during ripening stage, ____ the sucrose content in maturing cane.
The gene responsible for dwarfing in rice is
Hypothesis of no difference between the sample mean and population parameter be called as
The fruit of mustard is termed as
Among the cationic and anionic form of Nitogen, which form of Nitrogen is most preferred for plant uptake.
The four principles of organic farming do not include
Which of the following disease is not caused by nematode?Â
 Most effective induced mutagenic agents is
The largest exporter of floricultural in the world is ……………………