Question
The case of Waryam Singh v. Emperor (AIR 1926 Lah 554)
is on:Solution
IPC In Waryam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1926 Lah 554, a Division Bench, acting under Section 79 of the Indian Penal Code, held that an accused who killed a man with several blows from a stick was not liable under Section 302, Section 304 or Section 304A 'ibid' because he believed in good faith at the time of the attack that the object of his assault was not a living human being but a ghost or some object other than a living human being. The Division Bench made it clear that the ground for their opinion was that 'mens rea' or an intention to do wrong or to commit an offence did not exist in the case and that the object of culpable homicide could only be a living human being. (In this case appellant's wife along with her husband were taking a bath on grave of her child believing that they would get her son back. It was a dark night and villagers mistook husband to be a ghost and killed him).
He says,"The sun rises in the east."
She said to her friend, "What can I do to help you?"
Select the most appropriate direct form of the given sentence.
The policeman told the inspector that he had arrested a man for breaking the loc...
She said, " I really wish I had bought that new car."
Mohan will say, "I want two persons to assists me."
Select The Correct Direct / Indirect Form of the given sentence.
Father said to son, "avoid bad company.‛
Select the option that expresses the given sentence in reported speech.
Addressing the nation, the President said, "There are some days when we...
Select the correct indirect form of the given sentence.
She said, “Is anyone there in the house?”
Choose the option that is the indirect form of the sentence.
Akshay said, “I am making biryani today.”
Select the option that expresses the given sentence in reported speech.
Raghav said to Meera, “Are you upset with me?”