Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The judgment passed by the Privy Council in Mahboob Shah vs. Emperor case, became a landmark judgment as it differentiated between common intention and same intention. The judgment even in today's era is relevant and also of great importance. Kripal Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh: The learned Sessions Judge did not hold Appellant guilty u/s 307, I.P.C. on the finding that there was nothing on record to show that he had any intention or knowledge to kill Smt. Shanti Devi or that there was any common intention of any of the accused to do so. It may be voluntarily causing hurt.... So, the circumstances for an offence u/s 307, I.P.C. are not made out from the evidence on record. This is a simple case u/s 323, I.P.C. for which no common intention could be attributed to the other three accused besides Vijay Pal Singh. It is an offence committed by Vijay Pal Singh u/s 323, I.P.C. only. Jumman v. State of Punjab: It is clear that there was no pre-meditation and therefore when the contending factions met accidentally and attacked each other, the conflict resulted in a sudden fight, in the heat of passions, upon a sudden quarrel and without the accused having taken undue advantage or acted in a cruel or unusual manner. On the finding that both the parties had arms, there was no undue advantage taken by either. Hence Exception 4to Section 300, I.P.C., applies with the result that the offence is Under Section 304 (part 1), I. P.C. Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. King Emperor: Lord Sumner dismissed the appeal against the conviction and held that – “criminal acts means that unity of criminal behaviour which results in something for which an individual would be responsible, if it were all done by himself alone, that is, in criminal offence.”
A certain sum of money becomes Rs. 1300 in 1 year and 2700 in 3 years at certain rate of simple interest. Find the sum of money invested.
A sum is lent on compound interest for 2 years at 15% p.a. If the compound interest on the sum is Rs.5482.5, find the sum.
Suppose an investment of Rs. 20,000 is made in a financial scheme where the interest is compounded annually. The interest rate for the first year is 12%...
A invested Rs. ‘x’ in a scheme offering compound interest of 30% p.a. compounded annually. If at the end of 2 years, interest received by A was Rs. ...
Simple interest received at the rate of 15% p.a. for 2 years on a principal amount of Rs. 9000 is twice of the simple interest received at 10% p.a. for ...
A man borrowed Rs 300 and promised to pay back in 11 equal instalments of Rs 30 each. Find the rate of simple interest per annum?
The time required for a sum of money to amount to five times itself at 16% simple interest p.a. will be
Find the approx. compound interest on Rs. 5000 at 4% per annum for 2 years compounded half yearly?
What will be the ratio of simple interest earned on certain amount at the same rate of interest for 5 years and that for 10 years?
A man deposited Rs. 12000 at 10% compound interest, compounded annually while Rs. 10500 at 13% simple interest per annum. What will be the difference be...