Question
An Executive Director (ED) of SEBI orders an
investigation into "Z-Plus Brokers" based on a tip-off about 'Wash Trades.' The Investigating Authority (IA) conducts a search and seizure. During the proceedings, the IA records the statement of a Director of "Z-Plus Brokers" under oath. The Director later argues that the statement is inadmissible because the ED did not obtain "Prior Board Approval" in a formal meeting before directing the IA. Is the Director’s contention valid?Solution
Explanation: The law provides a specific administrative shortcut to allow SEBI to react to market volatility. Under Regulation 5 , the ED is legally empowered to act as the "Appointing Authority." Furthermore, Regulation 5(5) explicitly states that the IA may examine any person on oath and the notes of such examination may be used as evidence against such person. The Supreme Court in various rulings has upheld that regulatory investigations are valid as long as they follow the internal delegation of power (like Reg 5) and the IA follows the procedure laid down in the SEBI Act/Regulations.
What initiative provides 90% credit guarantee coverage to women-led MSMEs?
Which of these is a famous traditional craft of Himachal Pradesh?
The star-shaped temples were built during the reign of:
Which of the following statements are correct regarding photosynthesis?
1. Photosynthesis occurs in the chloroplasts of plant cells.
2. Th...
What is the capital of Albania?
‘Saka Era’ started from:
RBI was a privately held bank before 1949
In which year was the Sagarmala Project launched by the Government of India to enhance the performance of the country's logistics sector?
Consider the following literary works:
1. Gulamgiri
2. Darpan
3. Tritiya Ratna
4. Kavya Phule
Which of the above-ment...
What does S & P 500 relate to?