Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
State of Bombay v. Kathi Kalu Oghad is the landmark case which decided the scope of being a witness against oneself. An accused person cannot be said to have been compelled to be a witness against himself simply because he made a statement while in police custody, without anything more. Sheoraj v State:A record or memorandum of evidence or a statement or confession can be presumed to be genuine if it is taken in accordance with law. Also, the provisions of the Evidence Act make it clear that no person can claim the status of a witness except in relation to a proceeding before a Court. It follows that while an offence is still under investigation there is nobody who can be called "witness" and there is no statement that can be called "evidence", Fazal Sheikh v. Abdur Rahman: Wakf deed which is a private document kept in the office of the Sub-Registrar is a public document.
Primary tillage is completely avoided and secondary tillage is restricted to seedbed preparation in the row zone only. This is done in which type of til...
Which of the given above statements is/are correct?
With reference to organic farming in India, consider the following statements:
1.Sikki...
Goma Kirti is a improved variety of which fruit crop:-
Nipping – the removal of apical bud of young plants, is done in which crop?
The phenomenon known as buggy whipping in Sorghum is associated with which of the following factors? This condition typically affects the growth and de...
Growing of erosion permitting and erosion resisting crops in alternate strips is known as.
Which crop has the highest absolute increase in MSP for the year 2025-26?
Commercial method of propagation of gladiolus is :-
In which of the following processes CO2 is not released?
A short duration crop in between two main seasonal crops is termed as