New Master Descriptive Writing with our RBI One-Month Batch!
Register

Question

Circumstantial evidence is considered weaker evidence as compared to direct evidence

A Because it has 2 errors of fallibility: (i) of the fact from which inference is drawn being proved and (ii) of the inference to be drawn from the fact proved Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
B Because the inference in circumstantial evidence is based upon a presumption Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
C Because circumstances sometimes may tell a lie Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
D Because circumstantial evidence is based upon the process of deductive logic Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

Solution

Option A is most genuine Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that may infer the commission of a crime as it does not directly prove a key fact. It is typically weaker than direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence proves another fact from which a person may make a reasonable inference that a key fact occurred.

Practice Next
×
×