📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!
  • google app store apple app store
    • ✖

      Question

      Circumstantial evidence is considered weaker evidence as

      compared to direct evidence
      A Because it has 2 errors of fallibility: (i) of the fact from which inference is drawn being proved and (ii) of the inference to be drawn from the fact proved Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B Because the inference in circumstantial evidence is based upon a presumption Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C Because circumstances sometimes may tell a lie Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Because circumstantial evidence is based upon the process of deductive logic Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      Option A is most genuine Circumstantial evidence is indirect evidence that may infer the commission of a crime as it does not directly prove a key fact. It is typically weaker than direct evidence. Circumstantial evidence proves another fact from which a person may make a reasonable inference that a key fact occurred.

      Practice Next
      More Other Laws and Acts Questions
      ask-question