Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
Section 97 of Evidence Act Evidence as to application of language to one of two sets of facts, to neither of which the whole correctly applies. –– When the language used applies partly to one set of existing facts, and partly to another set of existing facts, but the whole of it does not apply correctly to either, evidence may be given to show to which of the two it was meant to apply. Illustration A agrees to sell to B “my land at X in the occupation of Y”. A has land at X, but not in the occupation of Y, and he has land in the occupation of Y but it is not at X. Evidence may be given of facts showing which he meant to sell.
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign (*) and ($) respectively in the expression ' B ≥ T ≥ D = Q = S * V ≤ F $ H ' in order to ma...
Statements: A ≤ B = C ≥ D > E > F; F = G ≥ H = I > J > K = L
Conclusions:
I. B > F
II. H = L
Statements: K ≥ L, N = R, L ≥ R, Q > C = K
Conclusions: I. R ≤ Q II. C ≥ N
If “M % N # O © P @ S © T $ W” is true then which of the following is definitely not true?
(i) M # P
(ii) O © T
(iii) N #...
Statements:
A ≤ B > E ≥ F; M > E < N
Conclusions:
I. N > F
II. B > F
Statement: A > B < D = E < C < F > G ≥ J; D > H
Conclusions:
I. A > H
II. F > H
III. D > F
Statements:K < L,L ≥ M,M > N
Conclusions: I. K < M II. N > K
Statements: C $ O, O% D, A © D
Conclusions:
I. A © O
II. D @ C
III. C © A
A statement is given, followed by four conclusions given in the options. Find out which conclusion is true based on the given statement.
Statemen...
Which of the following expressions will be true if the expression ‘J ≥ K > L ≥ M’ is definitely true?