Question
Queen v. Abdulla (1885) All 385 case law is related to:
Solution
Queen Vs. Abdullah is the case very relevant under the topic of Dying declaration as per S. 32 Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In this case the accused is charged for murder of a lady who makes a Dying declaration by her gestures, pointing towards the accused. Her throat is cut and therefore she makes a statement by way of conduct which has been considered by the Court as a relevant fact and admissible as Dying Declaration. Therefore, this case is relevant for “Conduct”
‘A’ and ‘B’ started a business by investing certain sum in the ratio 7:5, respectively for 8 years. If 25% of the total profit i...
'U' and 'V' jointly start a business by investing a total of Rs. 64,000, with their investments in the ratio of 9:5, respectively. They each invested th...
P and Q started a business with a combined investment of Rs. 8400, where their investments were in the ratio of 9 : a, respective...
‘X’ and ‘Z’ began a business with investments of Rs. 5,500 and Rs. 11,000 respectively. After 5 months, ‘Y’ entered the business contributin...
A and B started a retail store with initial investments in the ratio 5:6 and their annual profits were in the ratio 2:3. If A invested the money for 6 m...
K starts a business by investing ₹75,000. Four months later, L joins the business, contributing an amount that is 20% more than K's investment. At the...
P and Q invested in a partnership with Rs.400 and Rs.700 respectively. After 4 months Q added Rs. 'x' more. If at the end of the year profit share of P ...
- Two friends, R and S, started a venture where R’s capital was Rs. 2,000 more than S’s. R withdrew his investment after 10 months. If the ratio of their...
‘A’ and ‘B’ started a business by investing Rs. (x + 200) and Rs. (x – 800) for 8 months and 7 months, respectively. If the profit share of �...
Sunil and Manoj started a business by investing Rs. 70,000 and Rs. 1,20,000, respectively. Manoj withdraws his investment after some time. If at the end...
