Question
A previous Judgment is relevant to bar a second suit or
a trial as per which rule of evidence?Solution
S. 40. Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial. –– The existence of any judgment, order or decree which by law prevents any Court from taking cognizance of a suit or holding a trial, is a relevant fact when the question is whether such Court ought to take cognizance of such suit or to hold such trial.
I. 2x2 - 5x - 33 =0
II. 2y2 + 5y - 25 = 0
I. x² - 33x + 270 = 0
II. y² - 41y + 414 = 0
I. 3p² + 13p + 14 = 0
II. 8q² + 26q + 21 = 0
I. x² - 19x + 84 = 0
II. y² - 25y + 156 = 0
I. 8x² - 78x + 169 = 0
II. 20y² - 117y + 169 = 0
I. x2Â - 9x - 52 = 0
II. y2Â - 16y + 63 = 0
Solve the quadratic equations and determine the relation between x and y:
Equation 1: 6x² - 24x + 18 = 0
Equation 2: 5y² - 20y + 15 = 0
I. 2x² + 15 x - 27 = 0
II. 3 y² + 25 y - 18 = 0
I. x − √2401 = 0
II. y2 − 2401 = 0
I. x² + 3x – 154 = 0
II. y² + 5y – 126 = 0
