Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’?Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release.  The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
Where a person who is in a position to dominate the will of another, enters into a contract with him, and the transaction appears, on the face of it or ...
When Court refers parties to suit for settlement of dispute under Section 89 of the code of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff is :
Adult suffrage means-
What constitutes an assault under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Under the Biological Diversity Act, 2002, who is responsible for granting approval for access to biological resources for commercial use?
As per the Specific Relief Act when can section 8 of the Act be invoked ___
Which statement best describes a temporary injunction?
Under the provisions of The Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001, which of the following is not a requisite regarding inspection of a rented premise?
Who has power to reduce or remit court fee under Court Fee Act, 1870?
What can a Head of Department do to avoid punishment if their department violates the Act?
Relevant for Exams:
