Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In this case the Court decided the issue as to whether a foreigner committing an offence within the Indian territory shall be held liable under the Indian Penal Code or not. It was held that a foreigner who is committing an offence within India’s territorial limits cannot use lack of knowledge or unawareness as defence of ignorance of the law of the land. Thus, will be held liable for such an offence. It has been inferred from this case that phraseology of the statute can cover an offense under strict liability and bar the mental element. Therefore, nature of the mischief at which the arrangement is pointed in some cases albeit strict liability is deduced strictly on the facts of the case where is depicted as a grave social malevolence.
Under which section of the IPC, Gang rape is punishable?
Interim measures can be ordered by Court as per which section of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996?
Which of the following foilowing section of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 is related with the expulsion of a partner ?
Which of the following legal systems is based on judicial precedent?
According to the Transfer of Property Act, when can a Court issue a precept to another Court for the attachment of the judgment-debtor's property?
Which of the following is true about a Minor's liability in a partnership firm?
What is the term of office for the President of India?
Who is the Judge in case of Ashby Vs. White?
Under which products order specifications for vanaspati, margarine and shortenings are laid down?
In the case of a private company, ________________, shall be the quorum for a meeting of the company