Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
In this case the Court decided the issue as to whether a foreigner committing an offence within the Indian territory shall be held liable under the Indian Penal Code or not. It was held that a foreigner who is committing an offence within India’s territorial limits cannot use lack of knowledge or unawareness as defence of ignorance of the law of the land. Thus, will be held liable for such an offence. It has been inferred from this case that phraseology of the statute can cover an offense under strict liability and bar the mental element. Therefore, nature of the mischief at which the arrangement is pointed in some cases albeit strict liability is deduced strictly on the facts of the case where is depicted as a grave social malevolence.
Which of the following statements is correct regarding badminton?
I. At the beginning of the game of badminton and when the score is even, the ...
Aditya-L1 is equipped with specialized payloads to explore the Sun's photosphere, chromosphere, and corona. How many payloads in total are dedicated to ...
Settling down of heavier insoluble components of a mixture of water and insoluble substances is called:
“Simlipal National Park” is situated in which state?
Which of the following sites do “Not” have nuclear power plant?
According to the Agriculture Census, what is the recommended land size, in hectares, for categorizing a farmer as a small farmer?
Under the ‘Pradhan Mantri Jan-Dhan Yojana’ the accidental insurance cover has been increased from 1 Lakh to how much Rs now?
How many Fundamental Duties are mentioned in Indian constitution?
Which one of the following elements has the highest boiling point?
What cells help in osmoregulation in platyhelminthes?