Question
The famous case of Lalman Shukla vs. Gauri Datt is
related to:Solution
In this case it was held that for the purpose of entering into a contract two things are essential: (1) To have complete knowledge of the facts of the offer or proposal; and (2) Acceptance of the offer. To convert a proposal into an agreement both knowledge and assent to it must be present. However, in the given case, both were missing.  As the plaintiff had no knowledge and hadn’t given his approval or accepted the proposal so there did not exist a valid contract between the two. In the case it was held that for creating or entering into a valid contract there has to be knowledge and assent to the offeree made by the proposer.
The term Corporation under the General Insurance Business (Nationalisation) Act means__________________
Mark the incorrect statement with respect to Valuable security :-
Which of the following statements correctly describes a new provision introduced under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, that was NOT...
What are the members of the authorities deemed as under the The Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Ac...
Under the PMLA, who is responsible for maintaining records of all transactions and furnishing information to the Financial Intelligence Unit – India (...
A witness testifies that at the time of a property transaction 40 years ago, it was universally accepted in the community that a certain custom regardin...
With reference to The Indian Contract Act, 1872 read the following statements and select the correct option from below:
1. An agreement withou...
A public sector bank manager sanctioned loans to ineligible applicants. The applicants paid the manager Rs. 1 lakh per loan. The manager also facilitate...
Under Section 431 BNSS, when an appeal from acquittal is filed, the High Court may:
Facts bearing upon opinion of experts are: