Question
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court of
India has upheld the Constitutional Validity of Sec 377 Indian Penal Code?Solution
In 2013, the Supreme Court judgment dealt a big blow to gay rights activists. The apex court Bench upheld the constitutional validity of the Section 377 making gay sex an offence punishable with upto life imprisonment. The Supreme Court of India reinstated Section 377 of the IPC in Suresh Kumar Koushal and another v NAZ Foundation and others in 2013. The Delhi High Court judgment in 2009 had decriminalized Section 377 Naz Foundation vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi. On September 6th, 2018 the five-judge Bench partially struck down Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising same-sex relations between consenting adults. LGBT individuals are now legally allowed to engage in consensual intercourse. The Court has upheld provisions in Section 377 that criminalise non-consensual acts or sexual acts performed on animals.
According to the IRDA Act, 1999 intermediary or insurance intermediary includes__________________
According to Section 5of the IRDA Act, what is the tenure of office for the Chairperson and other whole-time members?
Consensus ad idem means
What is the effect of violation of the rule: “Audi Alteram Partem” on an administrative action?
Which of the following is not an exception to the general principle that ‘hearsay evidence is no evidence’ ?
What is the objective of Payment and Settlements Act?
A small company is a company whose paid-up capital and turn over shall________________
In tort law, what is the term for a wrongful act that leads to confinement or restraint of another person against their will?
How are the assets of any insurer in India be kept as per the Insurance Act, 1938?
After dissolution of the firm, goodwill of the firm __.
