The Supreme Court of India in the case of Kalyan Kumar Gogoi v. Ashutosh Agnihotri and Anr. (2011) took a note of the fact as to why hearsay evidence is not considered as relevant evidence under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The fundamentals of the evidence law state that the hearsay evidence is inadmissible in the court of law on grounds that the same is inaccurate and vague by its very nature. The case of Roop Kumar v. Mohan Thedani (2003) revolves around the scope and ambit of Sections 91, and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 that deals with ldquo;How much of information received from accused may be provedrdquo; is nothing but a proviso to Section 25 and 26 of the Act, as has been observed by the Supreme Court of India in the case of Bodh Raj @ Bodha And Ors v. State Of Jammu And Kashmir (2002). The issue before the Apex Court in this present case has been whether the weapon used to assault that has been discovered on the reliance of the information provided by the accused in custody, be sufficient enough to fasten the guilt of the accused or not. The case of Anvar P.V v. P.K.Basheer Ors (2014) holds immense importance in todayrsquo;s technology-driven world as the Supreme Court in this noteworthy case decided on the admissibility of electronic evidence in a court of the law taking into account Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. By interpreting the application of provisions 63, 65, and 65B of the Act of 1872, the Apex Court, in this case, overruled its earlier decision made in the case of State (NCT of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu (2005), commonly known as the Parliament Attack case. The three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Chief Justice R M Lodha, and Justices Kurian Joseph and Rohinton Fali Nariman by observing that an electronic record as a shred of secondary evidence shall not be admissible before the Court as evidence unless the requisites laid down by Section 65B are abided by.
The average age of a group of seven children is 10 years. From the group, two children, whose ages were 5 years more and 3 years more than the average a...
Average 20 numbers is ‘x’. If the average of first 12 numbers is 72.5 while average of last 5 numbers is 82.2 and 13th, 14th a...
The certain sum amounts to Rs11313.5 in 2(1/2) years at 12% p.a., interest compounded 10 months. The sum (in Rs) is:
The average age of the husband, wife, and their child 3 years ago was 24 years and that of the Wife and the child 5 years ago was 19 years. The present ...
20 students go for a picnic. 10 of them spent Rs. 64 each on their food and rest spent Rs.4 more than the average expenditure of all 20. What was the to...
Average of 20 numbers is 90. Average of first 8 numbers is 125 while average of last nine numbers is 40. If ninth number is 25% less than the tenth numb...
Average weight of a team of 8 persons is 50 kg. When one more person joins the team, the average weight of the team increases by 7 kg. Find the weight o...
There are three distinct numbers ‘a’, ‘b’ and ‘c’. If, a = 150, (a + b) = 450 and (c – b) = 60, then find the average of a, b and c.
...Average run scored by a batsman in 16 innings is 74. In next 6 innings, he scored runs with an average of ‘x’ so that his overall average increases ...
The average score obtained by 27 students in a class test is 68 marks. The top place was shared by 3 people who got the same score. If the lowest score ...