📢 Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert 👉 call Now!


    Question

    Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) held

    that: 
    A Parliament cannot amend any part of the Constitution Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    B Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights using Article 368 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    C Parliament has unlimited power Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    D Basic structure doctrine was introduced Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
    E Judicial review abolished Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

    Solution

    Held that FRs are trans-Constitutional; Parliament cannot amend them. Overruled by Kesavananda.

    Practice Next

    Relevant for Exams:

    ask-question