πŸ“’ Too many exams? Don’t know which one suits you best? Book Your Free Expert πŸ‘‰ call Now!

  • google app store apple app store
  • βœ–

      Question

      Golaknath v. State of Punjab (1967) held

      that:Β 
      A Parliament cannot amend any part of the Constitution Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      B Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights using Article 368 Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      C Parliament has unlimited power Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      D Basic structure doctrine was introduced Correct Answer Incorrect Answer
      E Judicial review abolished Correct Answer Incorrect Answer

      Solution

      Held that FRs are trans-Constitutional; Parliament cannot amend them. Overruled by Kesavananda.

      Practice Next

      Relevant for Exams:

      ask-question