Question
If Sheela commits an assault followed by attempt to
murder of Neha in a bar after consuming intoxicating substances, what will be the charge on her? Or will she get defence of intoxication?Solution
As per S. 85 of IPC S. 85. Act of a person incapable of judgment by reason of intoxication caused against his will.— Nothing is an offence which is done by a person who, at the time of doing it, is, by reason of intoxication, incapable of knowing the nature of the act, or that he is doing what is either wrong, or contrary to law: provided that the thing which intoxicated him was administered to him without his knowledge or against his will. Â
Statements: Z % Y; X # W; U % V; W & V; Y @ X
Conclusions:Â Â Â Â Â
I. U @ X Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ...
Which among the following symbols should replace the question mark [?] (in the same order from left to right) in the given expression in order to make ...
Which among the following symbols should replace the question mark [?] (in the same order from left to right) in the given expression in order to make b...
Statement: E ≤ F; E ≤ H; F = P; H < S
Conclusion:
I. S ≤ F
II. P ≥ S
In the following question, a relationship between different elements is shown in the statements followed by two conclusions I and II. Assuming the state...
Which of the following symbols should replace the sign ($) and (*) respectively in the given expression in order to make the expression A ≥ J and P ...
Relationship between different elements is shown in the statements. Find if the conclusions also follow or not.
Statements: J ≥ Q = W ≥ D <...
Statements: N $ J, J % O, OÂ * Â P, P # X
Conclusions :
I. X % J
II. N $ P
III. J % X
IV. X % O
Statements: P = Q = R > S > T > Z; U > R < V < W > X
Conclusions:
I. W > Z
II. R < W
III. R < X
In the question, assuming the given statements to be true, find which of the conclusion (s) among given two conclusions is /are definitely true and then...
