Question
If Anamika by her declaration intentionally caused
Rashmika to believe a thing to be true and to act upon it, Rashimika shall not be allowed to deny the truth of that thing in suit amongst both of them. Which is the principle of evidence applied in this case?Solution
S.121. Estoppel. When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing.
Which of the following is a "Scheduled Offence" under the PMLA, 2002?
When there is uninterrupted access and use of light or air to and for any building have been peaceably enjoyed as an easement over a property belonging ...
Provisions as to the Administration of Tribal Areas as to Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura and Mizoram is in which schedule of the Constitution of India?
When was the Constitution adopted?
Under the Consumer Protection Act a complaint must be resolved within three months if no analysis is required and within __________ if analysis or testi...
Amicus Curiae means_____________
An admission is:
Which of the following is a function that the District Authority may perform under the Legal Service Authorities Act?
Under the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), the principle of "Res Sub-Judice" (Section 10) provides that:
An accused person has been arrested and is in police custody. The accused wishes to meet with an advocate to consult about their case. Under which secti...
Relevant for Exams:
