Question
If Anamika by her declaration intentionally caused Rashmika to believe a thing to be true and to act upon it, Rashimika shall not be allowed to deny the truth of that thing in suit amongst both of them. Which is the principle of evidence applied in this case?
Solution
S.121. Estoppel. When one person has, by his declaration, act or omission, intentionally caused or permitted another person to believe a thing to be true and to act upon such belief, neither he nor his representative shall be allowed, in any suit or proceeding between himself and such person or his representative, to deny the truth of that thing.
More Civil and Criminal Laws Questions
- What is the composition of the Central Authority as per the Consumer Protection Act, and who appoints its members?
- Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which of the following best describes the principle of “Best Evidence Rule”?
- The period for acquisition of right of easement to use of light or air, way or other easement by prescription under Section 25 (1) of Limitation Act is:
- Who amongst the following is not a manufacturer as per Consumer Protection Act, 2019?
- Under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, when can hearsay evidence be admitted in court?
- According to the IRDA Act, 1999 the Central Government shall, while appointing the Chairperson and the whole-time members, ensure that____________
- S. 13 of CPC provides that a Foreign Jugdment shall ______________?
- What is the maximum imprisonment a Court can impose in default of payment of fine or community service, based on the amount of fine?
- As per the Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific relief can be granted
- According to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitawhat is the punishment for possessing a counterfeit seal, plate, or instrument with the intent to commit forgery?
Relevant for Exams:
