Question
The case of Kashmira Singh V. State of M.P. Is related
toSolution
It was held in this case that The confession of an accused person against a co-accused is not evidence in the ordinary sense of the term. It does not come within the meaning of evidence contained in sec. 3 of the Indian Evidence Act inasmuch as it is not required to be given on oath, nor in the presence of the accused and cannot be tested by cross-examination.
Where both the parties to an agreement are under a mistake as to a matter of fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is__________________
What will be the effect in the case of an alternative promise, where one branch is legal and the other illegal?
Which of the following amounts to breach of trust?
The maximum period of solitary confinement which may be ordered by the court is :
The Fund constituted under the IRDA Act, 1999 shall be only used for meeting_____________
What does FDCA stands for?
The Magistrate may award compensation to persons groundlessly arrested not exceeding:
Ejusdem generis is___
The Maharashtra Rent Control Act came into effect in the year?
Which of the following is an offence against State?