Question
The case of Kashmira Singh V. State of M.P. Is related
toSolution
It was held in this case that The confession of an accused person against a co-accused is not evidence in the ordinary sense of the term. It does not come within the meaning of evidence contained in sec. 3 of the Indian Evidence Act inasmuch as it is not required to be given on oath, nor in the presence of the accused and cannot be tested by cross-examination.
If the last day of the limitation period falls on a public holiday, what happens to the limitation period as per Section 27?
Under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, which of the following is an example of a "descriptive" mark that is generally not registrable as a trademark?
Contingent contracts to do or not to do anything if an uncertain future event does not happen can be enforced__________________
What is the rule regarding the use of identification modes under section 11A of the PMLA?
Under Limitation Act, suit for possession on the basis of prior possession may be filed within
Under Section 16(2) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, directors/managers are also guilty if offence committed with their:
The obligation under s.126 of the Indian Evidence Act________.
Under Section 2(47) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, which of the following would NOT qualify as an unfair trade practice?
Under Section 45 and Section 51 of the Indian Easements Act, 1882, an easement is extinguished upon the complete destruction of either the dominant or s...
Shareholder director means a director who represents the interest of shareholders, and elected or nominated by such shareholders_________________ as per...
