Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court Judgment in R K Malkani v. State of Maharashtra is related to the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction. This case deals with Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that facts which are so connected with each other as to form part of the same transaction are relevant to prove the existence of any one of them. In this case, the accused was charged with abetment of suicide of his wife, who had written several letters before her death, implicating the accused in her decision to end her life. The prosecution sought to introduce these letters as evidence against the accused. The court held that the letters were admissible under Section 6 as they formed part of the same transaction, i.e., the abetment of suicide. The judgment reaffirms the principle that evidence that forms part of the same transaction is relevant and admissible, even if it is not direct evidence of the crime itself.
.What is the rank of India in Human Capital Index 2017?
Consider the following statements in regards to Kshemendra:
a) He was an 11th-century poet from Kashmir in India
b) He wrote Kalavilasa an...
International Holocaust Remembrance Day is observed on:
The 2nd phase of 36 ‘Saansad Khel Mahakumbh 2022-23’ has been inaugurated in which district of the state Uttar Pradesh?
BharatNet is a project which works for:
Water soluble inorganic nutrients go down into the soil horizon and get precipitated as unavailable salts by which of the following process?
Recently, scientists have discovered over 300 new ‘Nazca Lines’ in which country?
Who was recently designated as India's next High Commissioner to the Republic of Rwanda?
The Swadhar Scheme is-
PSL targets are to be achieved on