Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court Judgment in R K Malkani v. State of Maharashtra is related to the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction. This case deals with Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that facts which are so connected with each other as to form part of the same transaction are relevant to prove the existence of any one of them. In this case, the accused was charged with abetment of suicide of his wife, who had written several letters before her death, implicating the accused in her decision to end her life. The prosecution sought to introduce these letters as evidence against the accused. The court held that the letters were admissible under Section 6 as they formed part of the same transaction, i.e., the abetment of suicide. The judgment reaffirms the principle that evidence that forms part of the same transaction is relevant and admissible, even if it is not direct evidence of the crime itself.
In which part of India, the first ever biggest drone festival has been recently inaugurated by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi?
Who is the writer of the book ‘Dangerous Earth’?
Which country did the famous football player Diego Maradona belong to?
From which constitution did India adopt the principle of 'procedure established by law'?
The Punjab Sports Department will host the Punjab Khed Mela, from 29th August 2022 which will be featuring _____ sports activities for the age group 14 ...
In which year, Pilibhit forests area was declared as the 46th Tiger reserve of India?
Which of the following is considered a good indicator of economic growth?
Who is the author of the book 'War and Peace''.
Which of the following US-based investment firm recently bought shares worth Rs 15,446 crore ($1.87 billion) in Adani Group?
Joao Manuel Goncalves Lourenco, has been re- elected as the President of which of the following countries?