Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
The Supreme Court Judgment in R K Malkani v. State of Maharashtra is related to the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction. This case deals with Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Act, which states that facts which are so connected with each other as to form part of the same transaction are relevant to prove the existence of any one of them. In this case, the accused was charged with abetment of suicide of his wife, who had written several letters before her death, implicating the accused in her decision to end her life. The prosecution sought to introduce these letters as evidence against the accused. The court held that the letters were admissible under Section 6 as they formed part of the same transaction, i.e., the abetment of suicide. The judgment reaffirms the principle that evidence that forms part of the same transaction is relevant and admissible, even if it is not direct evidence of the crime itself.
The perimeter of 4 squares is 20 cm, 32 cm, 36 cm and 40 cm respectively. What will be the area of the square having perimeter equal to sum of edges of ...
In the figure, ABCD is a cyclic quadrilateral with O as center of the circle If ∠ BOC = 136°, find ∠ OBC.
The sum of the ages of a mother and her daughter is 50 years. Four years ago, the mother was five times as old as her daughter. What are their current a...
What is the total sales for Product B in all four quarters combined?
Two years from now, a father's age will be twice the age his son was two years ago. Additionally, four years ago, the ratio of the father's age to the s...
(0.64) -2.5 = ?
A can complete a work in 12 days, while B can complete it in 15 days. How many days will they take to finish the work together?