Question
In which case it was held that every confession is an
admission but every admission is not confession?Solution
In Subbiah Mudaliar vs Gopala Mudaliar it was held that for a statement in a former suit to be admissible under Section 32(5) of Evidence Act that the person who made the statement must have special means of knowledge must be shown by independent evidence, otherwise it would be arguing in a circle to hold the document itself proves the relation therefore shows special means of knowledge In State(NCT of Delhi) vs. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru it was held that though every confession is an admission, every admission need not be a confession. An admission made before the police cannot be proved against the accused and cannot be considered a confession. In Kottaya vs Emperor the Court was of the opinion that the extent to which information is admissible depends upon the exact nature of the fact discovered to which such information is required to relate. (Admissibility of information under Section 27 of Evidence Act) In Gulzar Khan vs State it was held that the scope of Section 73 of Evidence Act extends to the court of Magistrate as well.
Orobanche is _____ type of parasitic weed.Â
Semi-conservative DNA replication was demonstrated by
When plant cells are placed in hypertonic solution, they become____
Which organization established by the United Nations focuses on internationally recognized standards and guidelines related to foods, food production, a...
What is the seed rate of hybrid cotton with a spacing of 120 × 60 cm?
All phenomenon of weather and climate takes place in
Dehorning of horned cattle is the process of removal of their horns or the process of preventing their growth. The process of dehorning is accomplished ...
The groundwater table is measured by:
ICAR- National Bureau of Animal Genetic Resources is situated at ___Â
Which of the following represents comprehensive cost of cultivation?