Question
In which case was it held that, the plaintiff should
provide an undertaking that defendant can be compensated in case Injunction suit is decided in his favour?Solution
Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v Coca Cola 1995 Relief by way of interlocutory injunction (Order 39 CPC) is granted to mitigate the risk of injustice to the plaintiff during the period before that uncertainty could be resolved. In order to protect the defendant, the court can require the plaintiff to furnish an undertaking so that the defendant can be adequately compensated if the uncertainty were resolved in his favor at the trial. Also, before granting an injunction, a court must give notice to the opposite parties unless it is satisfied that the object of granting the injunction would be defeated by the delay in giving notice.
Which of the following best represents a core principle of natural justice in administrative law?
Which Section of the Indian Penal Code. 1860 deals with right to private defence of body and property?
On whom burden of proof lies?
Under which section of the LLP Act relationship of partners is discussed?
Which of the following can be included as a property of the partnership firm?
What does the principle of Res Gestaeunder Section 6 of the Indian Evidence Actstate?
Which of the following statement is true?
Plaint shall state precisely the amount claimed in all money suits except amount for________.
Who can initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process as per IBC?
The rescission of a voidable contract may be communicated or revoked in the same manner, and subject to the same rules, as apply to the ________________
Relevant for Exams:
