Question
Oral admissions as to the contents of a document
areSolution
Section 22 of Evidence Act When oral admissions as to contents of documents are relevant–Oral admissions as to the contents of a document are not relevant, unless and until the party proposing to prove them shows that he is entitled to give secondary evidence of the contents of such document under the rules hereinafter contained, or unless the genuineness of a document produced is in question.Â
Amit and Bhanu put Rs. 14,400 and Rs. 19,200, respectively, into a startup. After 4 months, Chinu joined them with an investment of Rs. 10,800. If by th...
‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ entered into a partnership by making investments in the ratio 5:3:9, respectively. At end of the year, if the difference be...
In a business there are two partners ‘P’ and ‘Q’. ‘P’ started the business with the capital of Rs. 24000 and after 3 months ‘Q’ joined h...
A launched a business by investing Rs. 1920. Later, B joined the venture, contributing Rs. 2280. At the year's end, the total profit was Rs. 8600, with ...
A, B, and C invested Rs. 7200, Rs. 4800, and Rs. x, respectively, in a business for equal time. If the profit received by C is Rs. 2500 out of a total p...
A, B, and C invest ₹40,000, ₹60,000, and ₹80,000 in a business respectively. A and B withdraw their investments after 6 months, while C keeps it f...
A man invests ₹40,000 in a business. After 3 years, he sells 40% of his stake for a 30% profit and reinvests the amount. After another 2 years, he sel...
A and B started a business. After 3 years they received Rs 1245 as profit in which A's share is Rs 720, then find the ratio of investment of A and B.
Three friends, Aman, Bheema, and Chetan, together invested a total of Rs. 9400. After one year, they received profits of Rs. 1440...
‘A’, ‘B’ and ‘C’ started a business by investing Rs. 3,000, Rs. 3,600 and Rs. 2,400, respectively. After 6 months, ‘B’ decreased his inv...