Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
The terminal cell of the 2- celled proembryo divides by longitudinal wall and the basal cell and terminal cell both contribute to the development of emb...
NBPGR is located at
When one single gene starts affecting multiple traits of living organisms, this phenomenon is known as…………………..
...The larval stage is predatory whereas the adults are pollinator in case of
The range of correlation coefficient is ____
Quiescent centre is found in plants at
TDN stands for:
In which part of insect body, Johnston's organs are present?
Which of the following is correct for mode in statistics?
The deposition of pollen on the stigma of another flower of the same plant is known as :
Relevant for Exams:
