Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
A study published in the Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge highlighted the effectiveness of which traditional drug system in reducing anemia among...
How can a Sukanya Samridhi Account be operated?
What areas of cooperation are covered by the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed between India and Saudi Arabia in the field of energy recently?
Which of the following becomes the first public sector bank to launch RuPay or VISA credit card digitally against single or multiple FDs with 80% credit...
_______ will invest Rs 1.05 trillion into cloud infrastructure in India by 2030 as it looks to meet growing customer demand for cloud services in the co...
In which year was the National Cadet Corps (NCC) founded?
What is India’s rank in Global Drug Policy Index 2021 which is released by the Harm Reduction Consortium?
What was the total wealth of India’s billionaire promoters in December 2024?
At the WAVES Bazaar launch in Melbourne, approximately how many one-to-one meetings are planned between Indian and Australian filmmakers?
What was Mirabai Chanu’s total lift that earned her a silver medal at the 2025 World Weightlifting Championships?
Relevant for Exams:
