Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
Consider the following statements concerning the environmental impact of digital content consumption:
A) Digital activities contribute signific...
Which Maharatna company has been honored with the Best Green Bond Corporate Award?
Who will chair the RBI’s 10-member ’Expert Committee on Benchmarking of its Statistics'?
What is the name of the state-of-the-art technology project awarded to M/s Bharti-Airtel Ltd by CBDT to enhance the digital infrastructure of the Income...
In which state of India is the Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary located?
With reference to the Sanchar Mitra Scheme, consider the following statements:
1. The scheme, launched by the Department of Telecommunications (D...
What is the purpose of the Jiyo Parsi scheme Portal?
What was the primary technology used in the advanced water level monitoring system introduced by Northeast Frontier Railway?
Which Indian state recorded rural inflation of 4.10% in July 2024?
India’s rank has been improved in Global Innovation Index 2020 to 48th rank from _____ in 2019.
Relevant for Exams:
