Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
Cyprus iria belongs to the following group of weeds:
‘The law of limiting factors’ was proposed by
The minimum land slope required for irrigation through surface methods is:
The type of activity of Bacillus Megaterium bioinoculant in soil is
Who discovered the nematicidal properties of Ethylene Di bromide (EDB)?Â
Wheat is mainly a rabi cereal crop grown for food. Wheat inflorescence is…………….
"Ingredient" means:
Which of the following offers a sort of price guarantee on the part of farmers to cultivate the crop?
Late blight of potato is caused by
Who provided the earliest demonstration of disease resistance as a character transmissible from parent to offspring in the Mendelian fashion?
Relevant for Exams:
