Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
The Department of Commerce recently extended the Interest Equalisation Scheme for pre- and post-shipment rupee export credit for MSME exporters until Au...
What was the All-India Consumer Price Index (CPI) inflation rate for October 2024? Â
In Uttarakhand Revenue police system officially came into force in which year?
Small stone tools were first discovered in the Vindhya region of India by whom?
Which company has emerged as India’s most attractive employer brand in the Randstad Employer Brand Research (REBR) 2023?
Consider the statements about Politically-Exposed Persons (PEPs):
1. Ministry of Finance recently updated KYC norms for PEPs.
2. PEPs are ...
Who is known as the originator of the Beej Bachao Andolan (Save the Seed movement) in Uttarakhand?
Consider the following statements regarding the Greater One-horned rhino:
1.   Greater one-horned rhino is the only species of rhino found in...
Where was the 'Gagan Shakti-2024' military exercise conducted?
Which agency retained India's growth forecast at 6.6% for FY25 (June 2024), making it the fastest growing large economy?
Relevant for Exams:
