Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
- What will come in place of the question mark (?) in the following questions?
100−[20+4×5]=? What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
? = {1026 ÷ 54 + 17 × 13 – (384 ÷ 24)}Â
What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
? = (40% of 80% of 6400) ÷ 64
`sqrt(5476)` + 40% of 1640 = ? `xx` 4 - 2020
What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
? = 12.5% of 25% of 20% of 1280 + 1248
1 + 1 + 1/2+ 1/3 + 1/6 + 1/4 is equal to ____
- Find the simplified value of the given expression.
- Simplify:
25% of [160% of (42 + 18) + 124] ÷ 66 × 150 132 × 3 ÷ 11 + 67 − ? = 64 ÷ 8 × 2
What will come in the place of question mark (?) in the given expression?
Relevant for Exams:
