Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell      c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
The State of Meghalaya was created by
Which country has conducted the 'Exercise Garuda Shakti 24' with India?Â
Which of the following is not one of the five broad parameters used in constructing the Digital Payments Index (DPI) by the Reserve Bank of India?
As India is hosting the G20 Presidency for 2023 for the first time and it has invited many guest countries. Which of the following is not invited as a ...
In 1784, who discovered the composition of water through his experiment with hydrogen and oxygen?
According to the Census of India-2011, which of the following options represents a group of the most urbanised union territories in India?
Who among the following had received the Nobel Prize 2022 for Chemistry?
As of 2020, which country has the largest proven coal reserves in the world?
What is the monetary limit for goods transportation without an e-way bill for GST-registered persons?
Which of the following is used in photography?
Relevant for Exams:
