Question
Which of the following cases does not explain the maxim
‘Damnum Sine Injuria’? a. Bhim Singh Vs. State of J & K b. Action Vs. Blundell c. Chesmore Vs. Richards d. Ushaben Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Chitra Mandir.Solution
In the case of Bhim Singh Vs. State of J and K, the principle of Injuria Sine Damnum was applied. In this instance, Bhim Singh was a member of the J&k State Legislative Assembly who was detained by state police while on his way to a legislative assembly vote and detained indefinitely without charge. His wife filed a Habeas Corpus petition to gain his malafide release. The apex Court determined MLA Bhim Singh’s democratic right & awarded him Rs. 50,000 in compensatory losses. In addition, the appropriate police official was penalized for neglect of duty and misconduct.
- What is the primary purpose of Assam’s proposed satellite, ASSAMSAT?
What is the focus of the 'Prashasan Gaon Ki Ore' campaign launched during Good Governance Week 2024?
What is the significance of the Joint Table Top Exercise CINBAX held in Pune?
After the December 2025 MPC meeting, what is India’s revised repo rate?
Which term was selected as the Collins Dictionary’s “Word of the Year 2025”?
Under Delhi’s Atal Canteens scheme, how many canteens are being set up across the city?
What was the primary reason for Microsoft closing its office in Pakistan after 25 years?
The PMSBY aims to cover accidental deaths and injuries. Which of the following is NOT a common cause of accidents covered by the scheme?
The Jal Jeevan Mission has been extended till:
At the WHO Global TB Report 2025, India’s TB incidence declined from 237 per lakh (2015) to what level in 2024?
Relevant for Exams:
