Question
Luther Vs. Sagor case deals
with:Solution
The most appropriate answer will be option B that is retroactive effect of recognition as in the case of Luthor Vs. Sagor 1921 it was held that- Â the recognition of the state was retroactive in effect, thus the change of govt and the delay in recognising the new govt would have no impact before the English courts. It was held that the British Government recognized the Government of Russia and the retrospective effect will be applicable for that recognition.
Under the IBC, which of the following is NOT a condition for MSMEs to qualify for insolvency resolution?
Which of the following is not a subsidiary/associate company of SIDBI? Â
Which of the following is most likely to identify stocks with high earnings growth rates?
Which of the following actions is most likely to enhance the effectiveness of delegation in an organization?
Consider the following statements about ‘India's infrastructure journey’:
1.India's infrastructure journey has been domestic in outlook and i...
In India, a Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending company is required to be registered as a/an ______ with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).
Which of the following methods for calculating the Maximum Permissible Bank Finance (MPBF) considers the permanent level of current assets, also known a...
Consider the following statement regarding the Confederation of Real Estate Developers' Associations of India's (CREDAI) partnership with the Alliance f...
The credit risk free instruments issued by RBI on behalf of government of India in lieu of government’s market bearing programme are known as?
According to GFCI 38, which of the following statements is correct?