Question
The case of R v. Dudley and stephen is related to the
defence of :Solution
R v Dudley and Stephens deals with the taboo act of cannibalism asks the debatable question of having necessity as a defence
3720 3842 ? 4092 4220 4350
...D irection: Which of the following will replace ‘?’ in the following series.
543,’?’, 564 ,588, 660
...Given below are 3 numbers series I, II and III with an odd one out number (wrong number) in each of the series. The number that should actually come in...
979.001 + 4.0087 × 82.79 = ?
...28 34 63 ? 769 3847
...0Â Â Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 6Â Â Â Â Â Â 12 Â Â Â Â Â Â 20Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ?
...15 , 33 , 71 , 150 , 307 , 625
2556   636    156    ?    6
147      138       120      93      ?      12
...366Â Â Â 276Â Â Â 196Â Â Â 126Â Â Â 66Â Â Â ?
