Question
In which of the following case the Supreme Court has
held that the “three talaqs” would be treated as a “single talaq” and not a valid talaq;Solution
In the case of Shamim Ara v. State of UP (2002), the Supreme Court of India held that the triple talaq (pronouncement of talaq thrice in one go) would be treated as a single talaq and not a valid form of divorce under the Muslim personal law. The court held that for a valid talaq, the husband must follow the procedure laid down in the law, which includes giving notice to the wife and waiting for a period of reconciliation. The court also held that the practice of triple talaq is against the principles of gender justice and equality enshrined in the Indian Constitution.
Six persons (M, N, O, P, Q, and R) are sitting in a straight row facing north. P sits second to the left of R. One person sits between P and M. O sits ...
Six girls, P, Q, R, S, T and V, are sitting around a circular table. All of them are facing towards the centre of the table (but not necessarily in the ...
Five friends, D, E, F, G and H, are sitting in a straight line. D and E are adjacent to each other. E is between D and F. D is third to the left of G. G...
Which of the following statement(s) is/are true?
I. C and A are immediate neighbors
II. Only one person sits between E and D when counted ...
Who is paternal grandfather of M?
Which of the following is true?
How many candidates sit in the row?
Who among the following does not belong to the group?
Seven persons A, B, C, D, E, F and G sit around a circular table. All of them face away from the centre. G sits second to the right of F. Only two perso...
Six persons Om, Yash, Rohit, Prateek, Tanu and Umesh are sitting in a straight horizontal row facing towards the south. Umesh sits second to the right ...