Start learning 50% faster. Sign in now
There exists a rebuttable presumption under s.90 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 which is 30 years old and is maintained in a proper custody. As may presume is used in the provision, the court may call for proof on it. S. 90. Presumption as to documents thirty years old Where any document, purporting or proved to be thirty years old, is produced from any custody which the Court in the particular case considers proper the Court may presume that the signature and every other part of such document, which purports to be in the handwriting of any particular person, is in that person’s handwriting, and, in the case of document executed or attested, that it was duly executed and attested by the persons by whom it purports to be executed and attested. Explanation – Documents are said to be in proper custody if they are in the place in which, and under the care of the person with whom, they would naturally be; but no custody is improper if it is proved to have had a legitimate origin, or the circumstances
What is the main objective of incorporating pectin during the preparation of jams and jellies?
Which post-harvest technology is employed to extend the shelf life of fruits and vegetables by retarding the ripening process?
Which medicinal plant is known as winter cherry ?
Browning in cauliflower is due to deficiency of
The fruit of banana is botanically a/an
Pungency in radish is due to _____
King of Pippin is the variety of ......
Pusa Majestic is a variety of ________
The mutant variety of Carica papaya is :
Journal “Indian Horticulture” is published by _________