Question
A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and
which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, who will have the possession of the land?Solution
Section 102 IEA- The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Illustrations (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore the burden of proof is on A. (b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
You can ____________ interest rates on post office schemes to be ___________ in the next one year, if the rate upcycle continues.
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the highlighted segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No subst...
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If there is no need to substitute it, select ‘No substi...
Select the most appropriate antonym of the given word.
APPARENT
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If no substitution is required, select ‘No substitu...
Select the most appropriate option to substitute the underlined segment in the given sentence. If no substitution is required, select ‘No substitu...
In August 2021, Indonesia suspended (A) coal exports from 34 coal mining (B) companies it said failed (C) to meet domestic market obligasions (D) betwe...
Hyperactive
Growing up idolising (A) Saina Nehwal and her power game, a promise (B) shuttler on Thursday termed (C) her India Open victory over the Olympic medallis...
ADJUDGE - he should be given a fair chance to justify his actions,else he would be adjudged a traitor.