Question
A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and
which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, who will have the possession of the land?Solution
Section 102 IEA- The burden of proof in a suit or proceeding lies on that person who would fail if no evidence at all were given on either side. Illustrations (a) A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which, as A asserts, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father. If no evidence were given on either side, B would be entitled to retain his possession. Therefore the burden of proof is on A. (b) A sues B for money due on a bond. The execution of the bond is admitted, but B says that it was obtained by fraud, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side, A would succeed, as the bond is not disputed and the fraud is not proved. Therefore the burden of proof is on B.
Consider the following statements:
1. In India, intensity of cropping is high in the States of the peninsular plateau.
2. In India, the ...
Which of the following pair is not correctly matched?
A man deposited 40% of his salary to a bank which offers compound interest at the rate of 10% p.a. If the interest earned by him from the bank after 2 y...
Who of the following first used the word biodiversity?
PETA India’s person of the year 2022?
Consider the following statements regarding Saksham Anganwadi and the Poshan 2.0 initiative: Which of the following statements is/are not correct?
...Under the Factories Act 1948, how many minimum numbers of workers are required to establish “Canteen” facility in factory?
Consider the following statements:
1. The Constitution has empowered the only Union government to levy a tax on interstate supply of goods and ...
The country's first commercial-scale biomass-based hydrogen plant is coming up in which district of Madhya Pradesh?
Which of the following diseases is not caused by mosquitoes?
