Question
In the context of IPv4 vs. IPv6, which of the following
statements is true regarding address space?Solution
IPv4 supports a theoretical maximum of 2³² addresses, which is approximately 4.3 billion unique addresses. This limitation is one of the reasons for the transition to IPv6, which was developed to accommodate the growing number of devices connected to the internet. IPv6 supports an extraordinarily vast address space of 2¹²⁸ addresses, which amounts to approximately 340 undecillion addresses. This significant increase in address capacity allows for a virtually limitless number of unique IP addresses, making it possible to assign an address to every device on the planet, along with many more. The transition from IPv4 to IPv6 not only provides enhanced address space but also includes improvements in routing and network autoconfiguration. This transition is crucial for ensuring the scalability and functionality of the internet as the number of connected devices continues to rise. • Option B (IPv4 and IPv6 support the same number of unique addresses) - This statement is false, as IPv4's address space is vastly smaller than that of IPv6. • Option C (IPv4 has an unlimited address space) - IPv4 has a finite address space, which is a significant limitation that led to the development of IPv6. • Option D (IPv4 uses hexadecimal notation) - IPv4 addresses are represented in decimal notation (e.g., 192.168.1.1), while IPv6 addresses are represented in hexadecimal notation. • Option E (IPv6 was designed to be backward compatible with IPv4 addressing) - While IPv6 incorporates some transitional mechanisms, it is fundamentally a different protocol and not backward compatible with IPv4.
A seller marks up the price of an article by 35% and then gives a discount of 20%. What is the profit if the marked price of the article is ₹810?
An article costs ₹2000. It is sold at 10% loss. By what percent should the selling price be increased to make 20% profit on cost?
- The price of a sofa is marked at Rs. 5600. It is sold after allowing successive discounts of 20% and 10%. Determine the final selling price.
- A shopkeeper earned a profit of 28% on a gadget, while another shopkeeper sold the same gadget for a 20% profit. If the first shopkeeper’s profit was Rs....
The ratio of the cost price and selling price of a product is 3:2. If the product was marked up by 50% and later a discount of Rs. 500 was applied, dete...
The cost price of 20 mangoes is Rs.208. Because of bad quality of mangoes, the shopkeeper has to sell mangoes at a loss that is equal to selling price o...
A shopkeeper bought three items: a microwave for Rs. 25w, a refrigerator for Rs. 40w, and a washing machine for Rs. 35w. The average price of these item...
The marked price of a dishwasher is set 25% higher than its cost price. The seller then applies two successive discounts, first 15% and then an addition...
A shopkeeper marked an article Rs. 850 above its cost price and sold it after giving a discount of 30% and earned a profit of 20%. Find the cost price o...
A merchant sold a gadget incurring a 30% loss. If he had marked up the price by 20% and then given a 15% discount, he would have earned Rs. 120 more. Fi...