Question
Consider the following statements: I. Chevalier
de la Legion d'Honneur is the highest civillian honour of which country? II. It is given to recognise outstanding contributions to the recipient’s field of expertise, regardless of their nationality III. Recently Shashi Tharoor was given this honour for his writings and speeches. Which statement/statements is/are correct?Solution
French Government has decided to bestow the highest French civilian honour - Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur to Senior Congress leader and Thiruvananthapuram MP Shashi Tharoor for his writings and speeches. In 2010, Shashi Tharoor received an honour from the Spanish Government, the ‘Royal and Distinguished Spanish Order of Charles III’, established by the King of Spain Charles III to reward people for their actions benefiting the country and the Crown. About Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur The Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur (Knight of the National Order of the French Legion of Honour) was constituted by Napoleon Bonaparte to recognise outstanding contributions to the recipient’s field of expertise, regardless of their nationality. Chevalier de la Legion d’Honneur was constituted in 1802 as the highest civilian award given by the French Republic. Before Shashi Thaoor, several prominent names from India have been honoured with the French Highest Civilian Honour Chevalier de la Legion d'Honneur. Azim Premji, Amitabh Bachchan, Shah Rukh Khan, and Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw are some of the Indians who have received it. About France Capital: Paris Prime minister: Élisabeth Borne President: Emmanuel Macron
What does the final step, making the decision, involve?
Which of the following will not be a part of decision making process?
What is the benefit of using problem-solving techniques, such as the 5 Whys?
Which of the following correctly defines decision making?
As per Herbet Simon’s bounded rationality theory, the decision made is ______ in nature.
Rational decision making is relies on _______
In which decision-making technique do experts provide their opinions anonymously to avoid bias, and a consensus is reached after several rounds?
Why is it crucial to clearly define the problem in decision-making?
What type of bias relies too heavily on one piece of information in making a final decision?
How does feedback play a role after making a decision?
