Question
I. The Supreme Court judgment discrimination (A) the
rights of transgendered persons is a landmark ruling and restores (B) faith in the Court’s ability to recognise lack (C) injustice. II. The gross (P) of recognition of their gender identity curtails (Q) their access to education, health care and public places, and results in recognising (R) in the exercise of their right to vote and secure employment. Directions : Two sentences are given in the question below. Three words are emboldened in each of the sentence. Interchange the words to form a meaningful sentence.Solution
I. The Supreme Court judgment recognising the rights of transgendered persons is a landmark ruling and restores faith in the Court’s ability to recognise gross injustice. II. The lack of recognition of their gender identity curtails their access to education, health care and public places, and results in discrimination in the exercise of their right to vote and secure employment.
Five friends are sitting on a bench. Anil, Chandan, Raj, Guru, and Prem are sitting in a row facing north. Anil is sitting at the left end while Prem is...
Four of the five pairs are related to each other in some way and thus form a group, then which of the following pairs is odd among all five?
I, J, K, L and M are sitting on a bench all are facing towards the north. I sits next to J; K sits next to L. M sits at the extreme left end. K sits on ...
Who sits diagonally opposite to G?
Who is to the immediate right of Y?
Who among the following person faces E?
Which of the following statement is true?
How many persons sit between D and C?
Which of the following pairs represent those who sit at the extreme ends of the line?
Eight persons N, O, P, Q, R, S, T and U sit in a row facing north direction. S sits second to the left of Q, who is not extreme right end. P is second p...