Question

In each of the question below, four sentences are given. Find out which of the following sentences is/are incorrect grammatically or contextually. Choose the option that correctly identifies the incorrect sentence(s). (

Q: Answer-In each of the question below, four sentences are given. Find out which of the following sentences i...

Sentence A Correct has consistently upheld the present perfect correctly captures the Supreme Courts ongoing and historically established jurisprudential position. All other elements are grammatically and contextually sound. Sentence B Incorrect Rule After the perfect auxiliary having, the past participle is required to form the correct perfect passive construction having been past participle. Construction used without having being given this combines the perfect auxiliary having with the progressive form being, creating a structurally impossible hybrid. Having being is a grammatical impossibility in standard English. Correct construction without having been given perfect passive or alternatively without being given simple passive. Sentence C Correct must not go beyond what is strictly necessary the mandative construction after requires that correctly uses the base form throughout. The pronoun it correctly refers to a legitimate state aim. Sentence D Correct The sentence is grammatically precise and constitutionally accurate in its description of the basic structure doctrine and its source in the Kesavananda Bharati judgment.

A The doctrine of separation of powers, while not explicitly enumerated in the Indian Constitution, is reflected in the functional delineation between the legislature, executive, and judiciary — a delineation the Supreme Court has consistently upheld through its interpretations of Articles 13, 32, and 226. (
B The principle of audi alteram partem, one of the foundational pillars of natural justice, demands that no person shall be condemned or adversely affected by an administrative or judicial decision without having being given a fair and meaningful opportunity to present their case. (
C Proportionality review, adopted from European administrative law traditions and progressively incorporated into Indian constitutional adjudication, requires that any restriction imposed on fundamental rights must be rationally connected to a legitimate state aim and must not go beyond what is strictly necessary to achieve it. (
D The constitutional doctrine of basic structure, articulated in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, protects certain foundational features of the Constitution from parliamentary amendment — establishing that the constituent power of Parliament is not absolute but is constrained by the identity of the Constitution itself.