Question
In the question below, a sentence is given with two
words missing. You are given five options containing a pair of words that can fill the blanks making the sentence contextually correct. Identify the correct choice. Although there is a broad _________ that wetlands can protect coastlines, researchers have not explicitly __________ how and where these benefits translate into dollar values in terms of reduced risks to people and property. 1. Agree, estimated 2. Consensus, measured 3. Understanding, evaluatedSolution
First blank - we need a noun here to be modified by the adjective BROAD. The sentence talks about how there is an agreement that wetlands can protect coastlines. CONSENSUS and UNDERSTANDING will fit here. AGREE is a verb. Second blank - we need a verb here in the past participle form to fit in the present perfect tense construction HAVE + VERB. ESTIMATED, MEASURES and EVALUATED can all fit here, as the sentence talks about how researchers have not yet gauged how the benefits will translate into dollar values.
Who has been appointed as the new Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India?
On which day was Bank of Baroda's green term deposit scheme, bob Earth, announced?
Adani New Industries Ltd (ANIL) and the French giant TotalEnergies will invest $50 billion over 10 years in green hydrogen and, in the initial phase, bu...
The 55th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) introduced a new section in 2024 to showcase:
Which vaccine has been permitted by DAHD for use against Bird Flu outbreaks in India?
What mission has the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) launched to enhance farmers' income by using smart agro-technologies?
Which country did India sign a protocol with to establish the Joint Economic and Trade Committee (JETCO)?
Which city in Tamil Nadu hosts India’s second AI-powered Gold Loan ATM?
Which initiative aims to enable instant cross-border retail payments by interlinking domestic fast payments systems of ASEAN countries and India
What is the significance of the Supreme Court’s "social model of disability"?