Question

The Kaldor-Hicks compensation criterion for evaluating a policy change is considered an improvement over the Pareto criterion primarily because:

A It requires actual compensation to be paid, making it more equitable than the Pareto criterion
B It allows welfare comparisons across policies where some agents gain and others lose, which the Pareto criterion cannot handle, at the cost of ignoring distribution
C It resolves the Scitovsky paradox by requiring both the winners and losers to pass the compensation test simultaneously
D It is equivalent to maximising a Bergson-Samuelson social welfare function with equal weights
Practice Next

Hey! Ask a query