Question
In the questions given below, there are three
statements followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: No Colours are Paints No Paints are Walls Some Walls are Coats Conclusion: I. Some Coats are Colours II. No Colours are Walls III. Some Coats are not ColoursSolution
No Colours are Paints (E) + No Paints are Walls (E) → No conclusion. Hence conclusion I, II and III follow do not follow. But conclusion I or III will make a complementary pair. Hence either conclusion I or III follow.
Walraw’s Law states the following:
For a positively sloped LM curve, which of the following statements is CORRECT?
The Compensating Wage Differential theory predicts that, ceteris paribus, jobs that are considered less desirable (e.g., higher risk or unpleasant condi...
Based on the sticky-price model, the short-run aggregate supply curve will be steeper, the greater the_____
Which of the following statements about the expansion path is true?
The substitution effect for a commodity is
For the given data, n=10, XÌ… = 20, YÌ… = 40, ∑(X-5)^2 = 100, ∑(Y-20)^2 =160 and ∑(X-5)*(Y-20) = 80. Calculate the correlation coefficient ...
Which of the following is correct?
Within the AD-AS model, a phenomenon known as stagflation is best represented by a shift in which curve, and with what consequence for the short-run equ...
Longevity is proxy for ---- in the Human Development Index?
Relevant for Exams:
