Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts . Statements: All Detergent are Soap. Some Soap are Shampoo. Only Shampoo are Powder. Conclusions: I. Some Detergent are not Powder. II. All Shampoo can never be Soap.Solution
Only Shampoo are Powder → All Powder are Shampoo and Shampoo can have negative relation with anyone. Hence conclusion I and II follow.
Pointing to a photograph of Pankaj, Tarun said. "The mother of his sister is the wife of my wife's father". How is Tarun related to Pankaj?
Which of the following indicates that ‘D is grandmother of T’?
How is R related to N?
How is M related to H?
In a class of 40 students, Monika is 13th from the left and Rakesh is 32th from the right end. How many students are there between...
How is L related to J?
R, S, T, U, V, W and Y are seven members in a family. R is married to T, who has two children, S and U. W is the only son of V, who is sister- in- law ...
P, F’s father, has a grandchild, Vartika is the mother of K who has a son N, but K is not the daughter. K has a brother. Vartika and P are married...
A is the sister of B. C is the mother of D, who is the brother of B. C married to E. How is B related to E?
How is G related to the wife of L?