Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to take the three given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the three statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: All goggles are spectacles. All spectacles are lenses. Some glasses are goggles. Conclusions: I. Some spectacles are glasses. II. No glass is lens.ΒSolution
Some glasses are goggles (I) + All goggles are spectacles (A) β Some glasses are spectacles (I) β Conversion β Some spectacles are glasses (I). Hence conclusion I does not follow. All goggles are spectacles (A) + All spectacles are lenses (A) β All goggles are lenses (A) + Some glasses are goggles (I) β No conclusion. Hence conclusion II does not follow.
Sales Rs. 50,000; Variable cost Rs. 30,000; Net profit Rs. 6,000; fixed cost is_____.
When was the Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India Limited established?
Which station of the amended SARFAESI Act allows for the filing of a caveat by the lender in cases in which an appeal is expected?
Which Section of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 repealed the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act, 1909 and Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920?
Central Registry of Securitization Asset Reconstruction and Security Interest(CERSAI) is under which provision?
Under the IFSCA (BATF) Regulations 2024, what is the minimum required experience for the Compliance Officer of a BATF Service Provider?
According to the RBI recent announcement, the farmers who repay loans promptly under the Kisan Credit cards scheme will get an additional ___ % subsidy.
Financial product under IFSCA Act 2019 does not include
What is the maximum default amount eligible under Pre-Packaged Resolution process?
The term Gross Working Capital is known as: