Question
In the question below there are three statements
followed by three conclusions I, II and III. You have to take the four given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: Only Painters are Doctors. Some Painters are Lawyers. Only a few Teachers is Lawyers. Conclusions: I. At least Some Teachers are Doctors. II. At least Some Lawyers can be Doctors. III. Some Teachers are not Lawyers.Solution
Only Painters are Doctors → All Doctors are Painters and Doctors cannot have any positive relation with anyone. Hence neither conclusion I nor II follow. Only a few Teachers is Lawyers → Some Teachers are not Lawyers (O) and Some Teachers are Lawyers (I). Hence conclusion III follows.
What is the maximum time allowed by the Court to the parties to work out a mutually satisfactory disposition under Section 290(4)(a)?
Who is considered the "principal employer" in a factory under the Act?
Where a resolution is passed at an adjourned meeting of a company the resolution shall, for all purposes, be treated as_________________
Whenever the Central Government suspects that Coal can be obtained from any land, it may give notice to prospect for coal. Which of the following can b...
When principal may revoke agent's authority as per the Contract Act?
As per the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code what is the primary function of the State Occupational Safety and Health Advisory Boa...
How many designated partners are required in LLP:Â
Which of the following is true about making of an arbitral award?
In the case of R vs Foster, the witness saw the accident and a speeding truck. In this case was his statement held as admissible?
Confidentiality in mediation proceedings applies to:
